Allowed

M.I.D.C. Thr. C.E.O. v. Sk. Mohammad Sk. Bahira and 4 Ors.

Bombay HC29 Jun 2017CAF/892/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two orders passed by the Nagpur Bench. Civil Application [F] No.892 was allowed and disposed of on agreed facts. Civil Application [F] No.893 was allowed permitting an applicant to withdraw the remaining amount and accrued interest after an amendment.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is permitted to withdraw the remaining amount along with accrued interest upon making the necessary amendment.

M.I.D.C. Thr. C.E.O. Vs Sk. Mohammad Sk. Bahira and 4 Ors. — Bombay HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 caf892.20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION [F] NO.892 OF 2020 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL NO.68 OF 2010 [D]

¶5

[Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation .vs. Sk. Mohammad Sk. Bahira and others]

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶7

Shri Agnihotri, Advocate for the appellant,
Shri P. Ghare, Advocate for respondents-applicants.

¶8

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND N.B. SURYAWANSHI, JJ. DATED : 8th OCTOBER, 2020.

¶9

“Hearing was conducted through Video
Conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the
audio and visual quality was proper.

¶10

2.Heard learned Advocate for applicants and
learned Advocate for acquiring body, who has no
objection to allow this application.

¶11

3.For the reasons recorded in the application,
the application is allowed in terms of the prayer made
therein and disposed of.

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION [F] NO.893 OF 2020

¶13

1.This is an application for withdrawal of
amount in terms of order passed in First Appeal

¶14

2 caf892.20

¶15

No.68/2010, vide order dated 24.9.2019.

¶16

2.The prayer made in this application is not
objected by the contesting party.

¶17

3.After the amendment is made in pursuance of
order passed in CA No.892/2020, the applicant no.3 is
permitted to withdraw the remaining amount along with
accrued interest.

¶18

4.Civil Application is allowed and disposed of.

¶19

JUDGEJUDGE

¶20

Gulande

M.I.D.C. Thr. C.E.O. v. Sk. Mohammad Sk. Bahira and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.I.D.C. Thr. C.E.O. v. Sk. Mohammad Sk. Bahira and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra Jeewan Pradhikaran, Thr. Its Exe. Engineer and Anr. Vs Abdul Aziz Sheikh Kadar and Anr.

Narendra Sureshrao Bawankar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Rajapeth Tq. and Dist.Amravati and Another

Dr. Sau. Nanda Rajendra Vaidya vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Ballarpur Tah.Ballarpur Dist.Chandrapur and Another