Disposed

Shri. Shashant Anand Kamat v. Smt. Malini Balaji Kamat, Nee Malini Anant Waravdekar

Bombay HC23 Mar 2017CAF/593/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a case involving a deceased appellant, the court disposed of civil applications regarding substituted service. The issue of the applicant's entitlement to substitute the deceased remains open. Pending orders were allowed to continue.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application No. 593 of 2016 allowed for substituted service; Civil Application No. 3406 of 2015 disposed of for the present.

Shri. Shashant Anand Kamat Vs Smt. Malini Balaji Kamat, Nee Malini Anant Waravdekar — Bombay HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

skc

¶2

913-CAF-3406-15.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3406 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1061 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 593 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1061 OF 2014

¶4

Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar .. Appellant vs. Malini Balaji Kamat nee Malini Anant Waravdekar & Ors. .. Respondents

¶5

Mr. V. K. Nair for Applicant / Appellant. Mr. Rajesh Jain i/b. Legal Juris for Respondents.

¶6

CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 23 MARCH 2017

¶7

P.C :

¶8

1] Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

2] This First Appeal was instituted by the appellant - Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar. There is no dispute that Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar has expired.

¶10

3] Civil Application No. 4322 of 2015 is taken out by Shashant Anand Kamath, seeking to come on record in place of deceased Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar. He claims this privilege on the basis of an alleged Will executed in his favour by Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar on 26 April 2007. There is no progress in this civil application, since, respondent nos. 2 to 7 are yet to be served.

¶11

4] By Civil Application No. 593 of 2016, Shashant Anand Kamath seeks leave to serve respondent nos. 2 to 7 by substituted service.

1/2

skc

913-CAF-3406-15.doc

5] Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that Shashant Anand Kamath is not entitled to come on record in place of deceased Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar. His objection can always be heard. However, it will be appropriate, if, service is effected upon the remaining respondents as well. Accordingly, Civil Application No. 593 of 2016 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). For the purposes of service, the returnable date shall be 4 May 2017. The applicant Shashant Anand Kamath to take necessary steps to effect service by publication as prayed for by him, and thereafter to file affidavit of service along with the copies of the paper publications.

¶16

6] The issue as to whether Shashant Anand Kamath is entitled to pursue this matter or not is specifically kept open.

¶17

7] Civil Application No. 593 of 2016 is disposed of accordingly.

¶18

8] By Civil Application No. 3406 of 2015, service upon respondent nos. 2 to 7 by substituted service is again applied for. At this stage, it is not possible to consider this Civil Application, since, the appellant Rekha Gurudas Waravdekar has already expired and issue as to whether Shashant Anand Kamath can pursue this matter is yet to be decided. Therefore, Civil Application No. 3406 of 2015 is disposed of for the present.

¶19

9] The interim orders granted earlier in these proceedings shall however continue.

¶20

(M. S. SONAK, J.)

¶21

Chandka

¶22

2/2

Shri. Shashant Anand Kamat v. Smt. Malini Balaji Kamat, Nee Malini Anant Waravdekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Shashant Anand Kamat v. Smt. Malini Balaji Kamat, Nee Malini Anant Waravdekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wadhwa Group Holdings Private Limited Vs Mr.Ismail Khan S/O. Kadar Khan and Anr.

Smt. Ashrafi Brijpal Singh C.a.O.Sanjay Sharda Prasad Kalwar and Anr. Vs Kishor Maruti Patil and Ors.

M/S. Zahra Developments Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Sri Mangal Murty Marketing Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt. Kushrana Balkishan Maniyar and Others

Mrs.Anwar Bano Ali Abbas Sayed and Ors. Vs M/S. Oswal Builders and Anr.