Arun Purshottm Ratnaparkhi v. Shahebrao Gomaji Tayade and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
No.2503of 2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; permitted to deposit 50% of decretal amount by demand draft.
No.2503of 2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT
Application allowed; permitted to deposit 50% of decretal amount by demand draft.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Civil Application No.2503of 2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 2503 OF 2017 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.135 OF 2017
( Arun Purshottam Ratnaparkhi ..vs..Sahebrao and another )
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J. DATED : JUNE 19, 2017
Heard Shri Alok Daga, learned counsel for the
applicant/appellant.
None appeared for the respondents.
For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed.
The applicant- appellant is permitted to deposit 50% of the decretal amount by demand draft during the course of the day.
JUDGE
kitey
Arun Purshottam Ratnaparkhi
Sahebrao and another
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court