Single judge civil appellate court allowed a civil application (ST) concerning the admissibility of public documents as additional evidence, dismissing the matter with liberty to the respondent to file a rebuttal.
Civil Application allowed with liberty to the Respondent to file additional reply to rebut such additional evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16 &78CAA_1402 with ao1127_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.16341 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1127 OF 2015
Madhukar Balbhim Jadhav & Ors. ...Applicants
Versus
Ambadas Eknath Jadhav & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Vishwanath Talkute with Mr. S.R. Ghanvat for the Applicants. Mr. Rahul Kate for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 4th JULY, 2017.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsels for the respective parties. I have perused the records. The documents sought to be produced are public documents, having bearing on the merits of the matter.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Megha
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhukar Balbhim Jadhav & Ors.
Ambadas Eknath Jadhav & Ors.
Anuja Prabhu-dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
