Single judge order dismissing a company application as premature because the underlying company petition had not yet been admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50.CA-984-2015.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.984 OF 2015 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.1122 OF 2015
Ahuja Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. ....Applicant/Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. Gstaad Hotels Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent
Ms. Shirin Shaikh i/b. Mr. Raval Shah for applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Shrikant Doijode a/w. Ms. Rashne Mulla-Feroze i/b. Doijode Associates for respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
1 The petition itself is yet to be admitted. Therefore, this application is premature.
2 Therefore, application stands dismissed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Ahuja Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Gstaad Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
