The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Pandurang Bhila Vanjari

Heard learned AGP for the applicants-State authorities. Despite service of notice none appears on behalf of respondents/original claimants. Perused the application.

¶12

This is an application for condonation of 1868 days delay caused in filing the appeal against impugned judgment and award of the Reference Court in LAR No. 1585 of 1998. According to learned AGP, the so-called delay was not intentional or deliberate but caused due to official process. He submits that exorbitant compensation came to be enhanced by the Reference Court in favour of claimant in this case. He prayed to condone the delay.

¶13

In view of submissions and reasons mentioned in the application there is no impediment to condone the delay. There are allegations about the exorbitant amount enhanced by the Reference Court, in such circumstances public funds would be at stake and no individual would be affected. In order to provide reasonable opportunity to the

¶14

2 928-CA-8497-16

¶15

applicant, the delay is required to be condoned by adopting liberal and pragmatic approach in this case Hence, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause B. The delay caused in filing the appeal against impugned judgment and award is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process.

¶16

On registration of appeal, issue notice to respondent.

¶17

List the appeal for admission in due course.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

[ K. K. SONAWANE ] JUDGE

¶20

MTK.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Pandurang Bhila Vanjari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Pandurang Bhila Vanjari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriniwas Babarao Patil. Vs the State of Maharashtra.

The Executive Engineer Aurangabad Vs Mahadeo Sauda Chavan and Another

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Strengthening Divn, Omerga Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad Vs Vishwanath Krishna Khandekar (Died) Thr Lrs Gayabai and Ors.

Asha Sugriv Narsinge and Ors. Vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Authorized Signatory Aurangabad and Ors.

The G M I D C Thr the Executive Engineer Vs Shamrao Abhiman Died Thr Lrs Sheshrao Shamrao Bhadarge and Others