Allowed

The State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Maruti Mind

Bombay HC7 Apr 2017CA/615/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench condoned a delay of 667 days in filing First Appeals. Appeals were heard and notice was issued but waived by the respondent. Stay applications for the execution of impugned judgments and awards were allowed, conditioned on the applicant depositing the award amount with interest within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 667 days condoned; stay on execution of impugned judgments granted conditional upon deposit of award amount with interest within 12 weeks.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Shivaji Maruti Mind — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

998.ca.615.17

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2017

¶5

IN FAST/38934/2016 WITH CA/616/2017 IN FAST/38934/2016 WITH CA/617/2017 IN FAST/39066/2016 WITH CA/618/2017 IN FAST/39066/2016 WITH CA/619/2017 IN FAST/39063/2016 WITH CA/620/2017 IN FAST/39063/2016

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

SHIVAJI MARUTI MIND

¶9

AGP for Applicant : Shri A.M.Phule. Advocate for Respondents : Shri Gore Ravindra Vitthal.

¶10

CORAM: V.K. JADHAV, J. DATE :- 07^th April, 2017.

¶11

Per Court:

¶12

1 Insofar as the Civil Applications for condonation of delay are

¶13

concerned, heard the learned AGP for the Applicant/ State and the

¶14

learned counsel for the Respondent/ Claimant.

¶15

2 The learned AGP submits that due to administrative difficulties, the appeals could not be preferred within a period of limitation.

¶16

3 The learned counsel for the Respondent has strongly resisted the applications on the ground that the delay has not been explained satisfactorily.

¶17

4 In view of the above submissions and for the reasons stated in the Civil Applications, delay of 667 days caused in filing the First Appeals

¶18

2 998.ca.615.17

¶19

is hereby condoned. The Civil Applications are allowed and accordingly, disposed of.

¶20

5 Heard in the Appeals. Issue notice in the Appeals to the Respondents, returnable on 28.06.2017. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents waives notice.

¶21

6 Call for the record and proceedings.

¶22

7 Insofar as the Civil Applications for stay are concerned,

¶23

pending the hearing and final disposal of the First Appeals, the execution, implementation and operation of the impugned judgments and awards under appeals is hereby stayed on the condition that the Applicant shall deposit the entire amount under the award with accrued interest thereon, in this Court within a period of 12 (twelve) weeks from today, failing which the order granting stay shall stand vacated automatically without further reference to the Court. The Civil Applications for stay are accordingly, disposed of.

¶24

KPS.

The State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Maruti Mind

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra v. Shivaji Maruti Mind

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padminibai Maroti Shikhare and Ors. Vs Union of India, Thr G.M. South Central Railways, Secunderabad (Andra Pradesh)

Bhausaheb Panditrao Kaste and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Babita Madhukar Badgujar and Others

The State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyandeo Rangnath Darange and Anr.

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Thr the Executive Engineer and Anr. Vs Sayyad Sadatullha Syed Safiullha Bijapure and Anr.

The Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Yogita Santosh Yadav and Ors.