In this brief Company Application, the Single Judge allowed the application filed by Narbadeshwar Pandey, dismissing the objection of the company prosecutor, and disposed of the matter based on the prayer clauses.
The application is allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clauses a and b.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38.CA-593-2017.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.593 OF 2017 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.1125 OF 2001
Narbadeshwar Pandey
….Applicant
And B.I.F.R. ….Petitioner
Vs.
The Official Liquidator of M/s. HES Limited (In Liqn.) ....Respondent
Ms. Molina P. Thakur for applicant.
Mr. Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 20th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
1 Heard the counsel for applicant and also considered the affidavit in support. The Company Prosecutor has no objection.
2 Therefore, application is allowed and accordingly disposed in terms of prayer clauses – (a) and (b).
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Narbadeshwar Pandey
B.I.F.R.
The Official Liquidator of M/s. HES Limited (In Liqn.)
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
