Allowed

Anita Santosh Sonawane v. Walmik Rangnath Desai and Others

Bombay HC25 Apr 2017CA/5783/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a civil application to amend the writ petition. The petitioner was permitted to bring on record documents received after filing and include them in the amended petition, with service of copies on respondents required within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application allowed; petitioner permitted to amend Writ Petition to include subsequent documents; amendment to be done within two weeks.

Anita Santosh Sonawane Vs Walmik Rangnath… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

(1)C.A. No. 05783 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

¶3

Civil Application No. 05783 of 2017 (In Writ Petition No. 10621 of 2016)

¶4

District : Aurangabad

¶5

Mrs. Anita w/o. Santosh Sonawane,
Age : 30 years,
Occupation : Agriculture,
R/o. Ambelohal,
Taluka Gangapur,.. Applicant
District Aurangabad. (Original petitioner)

¶6

versus

¶7

Walmik s/o. Rangnath Desai,
Age : 45 years,
Occupation : Agriculture,
R/o. Ambelohal,
Taluka Gangapur,
District Aurangabad,
 & 04 others. .. Non-applicants.

¶8

...........

¶9

Mr. P.N. Sonpethkar, Advocate, for the applicant.

¶10

Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, Asst. Government Pleader, for non-applicant nos.03, 04 and 05.

¶11

...........

¶12

CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA, J.

¶13

 DATE : 25TH APRIL 2017

¶14

ORAL ORDER :

¶15

Heard.

¶16

02.This Civil Application has been taken out by
the petitioner to bring on record documents received

¶17

(2)C.A. No. 05783 of 2017

¶18

by the petitioner subsequent to filing of the
petition. The applicant - petitioner seeks to rely
upon the documents, annexed with the Civil
Application, at the time of hearing of the Writ
Petition.

¶19

03.It would be appropriate to permit the
petitioner to amend the Writ Petition and bring on
record the documents annexed with the Civil
Application, so that the same could be considered in
the consolidated petition.

¶20

04.Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause "B". Amendment be carried out
within a period of two weeks from today. The
petitioner - applicant shall serve copy of the
amended petition on the respondents.

¶21

 ( M.S. Sanklecha )
 JUDGE

¶22

...........

¶23

puranik / CA5783.17

Anita Santosh Sonawane v. Walmik Rangnath Desai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anita Santosh Sonawane v. Walmik Rangnath Desai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Shafi Abdul Rehaman Pinjari and Another Vs Dilip Ramanlal Kabra

Gayabai Ganpati Sarode Vs Datta Ananda Sarode and Others

Padmansinh Atmaram Wadje Vs the District Deputy Registrar Co. Operative Societies Nanded and Others

Shankar Shridhar Raut Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Mallikarjun Gangadharappa Ankalkote and Another Vs M/S Goyal Trading Company through Power of Attorney Holder D M Agarwal

Mangal Prakash Mulgir and Others Vs State of Maharashtra and Others