This court allowed Civil Application No. 3712 of 2016 to condone a 30-day delay in filing the first appeal against a judgment and order passed by the Civil Judge, Nandurbar.
The application is allowed and delay of 30 days is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
939 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3712 OF 2016 IN FAST/7942/2016 WITH CA/3714/2016 IN FAST/7942/2016
MALTIBAI TANAJI PADAVI AND ORS VERSUS KILUBAI ALLEGED TANAJI PADAVI
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Mahesh P. Kale Adv. for Respondent sole : Mr. Amit Savale
CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.
DATE : 16th August, 2017.
PER COURT:
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and respondents. In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, there is no impediment to condone the meager delay of 30 days in filing the First Appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.), Nandurbar in M.A. NO. 04 of 2013.
2] Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Delay is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process. List the matter for hearing at admission stage on 21st September, 2017.
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 30-day delay in filing the first appeal is condonable.
Maltibai Tanaji Padavi and Ors
Kilubai Alleged Tanaji Padavi
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
