Disposed

Dagadu Namdeo Singare v. the Executive Engineer Construction Civil M.S.E.D.C.L Latur and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Oct 2017CA/3368/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court permitted applicants to withdraw Rs. 15 Lakhs from compensation pending appeal, provided they filed an undertaking to return the amount with interest if they lose the appeal. The balance must be deposited in a fixed deposit.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw Rs. 15 Lakhs from compensation on undertaking to return it with interest if the appeal fails; balance to be invested in Fixed Deposit.

Dagadu Namdeo Singare Vs the Executive Engineer Construction… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

C.A. No.3368/2017

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3368 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.253 OF 2015

¶5

Dagadu s/o Namdeo Shingare … APPLICANTS

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The Executive Engineer, Construction (Civil), M.S.E.D.C.L., and others

¶8

… RESPONDENTS

¶9

Shri S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for applicants Shri P.B. Paithankar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri B.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for State

¶10

CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATED: 12th October, 2017.

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

After considering the submissions made by the

¶13

learned counsel for the parties and in view of the fact that the issues raised by the acquiring body in this First Appeal are highly debated and requires detailed consideration, however, in view of the applicant suffering from various diseases and requires medical assistance, by consent of parties, we are inclined to permit the applicants to withdraw a sum of Rs.15,00,000/(Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) upon the applicants furnishing an undertaking to the effect that if the applicants fail in the First Appeal filed by the acquiring body, the applicants would return

¶14

C.A. No.3368/2017

¶15

¶16

the said amount with interest as may be directed by this Court. It is made clear that if such undertaking is not filed within four weeks from today, the withdrawal shall not be permitted in favour of the applicants. If any such undertaking is filed, such undertaking shall be continued till the disposal of the First Appeal and for a period of four weeks thereafter. Copy of the undertaking shall be furnished to the learned Advocate who represents the acquiring body simultaneously.

¶17

If the balance amount is not invested by the learned Registrar (Judicial) so far, the same shall be invested in a Fixed Deposit of a Nationalised Bank initially for a period of two years and thereafter for like period after obtaining orders from this Court.

¶18

Civil Application is disposed of in aforesaid terms. No

¶19

order as to costs.

¶20

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE

¶21

fmp/

Dagadu Namdeo Singare v. the Executive Engineer Construction Civil M.S.E.D.C.L Latur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dagadu Namdeo Singare v. the Executive Engineer Construction Civil M.S.E.D.C.L Latur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxuman Malappa Chavan Vs M.I.D.C. through Divisional Officer Division at Latur and Ors.

Idmc Ltd. Thr Its Authorized Representative, Gujarat Vs M/S Lila Sons Industries Ltd, Aurangabad

Jahidabee Begum Bashir Sayyed and Ors. Vs Vice Chancellor Marathwada Agricultural University Parbhani and Anr.

Balawant Rambhau Shingare (Deceased) Thr His Lrs Shahaji and Anr. Vs the Executive Engineer Construction Civil Msedcl Latur and Ors.

Gunderao Narsingrao Gajkos and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Subhash Sangappa Zidge and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others