The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging a communication regarding marks in PGA-CET admissions, noting the petitioner's absence and the exhaustion of the petition's purpose with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1164 OF 2005
Sumendharani Krishnarao Deshpande
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
RESPONDENTS
None for the petitioner
Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2017
ORAL ORDER :
On the last occasion, on 4th September, 2017,
when the matter was called out, none appeared for the
petitioner. Today also, none appears for the
petitioner when the petition is called out.
2.Even otherwise, looking at the subject matter
of the petition, the petitioner purports to challenge
the communication dated 15th February, 2005, whereby
the petitioner had been communicated that there is no
change in the marks. Said communication pertains to
2 wp1164-2005
the marks obtained in PGA-CET 2004-05 for admissions to
post-graduate courses. With efflux of time, it appears
that purpose underlying the writ petition gets
exhausted. The petition, in the circumstances, has been
rendered inefficacious and stands disposed of as such.
3.In view of disposal of the writ petition, civil
application No. 2800 of 2005 does not survive and stands
disposed of.
npj/wp1164-2005
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a communication regarding no change in marks for post-graduate admissions stands effective after a long delay.
Sumendharani Krishnarao Deshpande
The State of Maharashtra
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court