The applicant sought service of notice via newspaper publication to respondent no. 3. Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that Vakalatnamas for respondent 1 and 2 were already filed.
Notice issued to respondent no. 3 by newspaper publication only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca2221.07
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2221 OF 2007
IN FA/725/2003
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD
VERSUS
MAMTA JITENDRA JOSHI & ORS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Vinayak N Upadhye
Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. K.M.Nagarkar
.....
CORAM: K.L.WADANE, J.
DATED: 5th October, 2017
O R D E R :
This is an application for service of notice
by paper publication to respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.
1 and 2 submits that he has already filed his
Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Now, learned counsel appearing for the
applicants prays to issue notice in news paper only to
respondent no.3
Hence, issue notice to respondent no.3 as
prayed for.
Civil Application is disposed of.
dbm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant was entitled to issue notice by newspaper publication to respondent no. 3 alone.
Whether the application for service of notice by paper publication should be allowed.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD
MAMTA JITENDRA JOSHI
SUKHWINDER JOSHI
SNEHAL JOSHI
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court