Petitioner challenged an order, noting a previous writ petition had become infructuous. This petition and a related civil application were disposed of as moot.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; linked civil application also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6706 OF 2005
Shaikh Salimoddin Sk. Shamshoddin
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
RESPONDENTS
Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, advocate for the petitioner
Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 5
Mr. P.S. Dighe, advocate for respondent No.6
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2017
ORAL ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner states
that in view of the order passed in writ petition No.
9380 of 2011, this petition has been rendered
infructuous. The writ petition, as such, stands
disposed of.
2.In view of disposal of the writ petition,
civil application No.1697 of 2009 does not survive and
stands disposed of.
npj/wp6706-2005
Shaikh Salimoddin Sk. Shamshoddin
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil P. Deshmukh
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court