Rejection of applications for stay of execution of an award due to non-compliance by the appellant with a prior order requiring deposit of the decretal amount within the stipulated period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
19 sr.no stay ca 16925.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
19 CA/16925/2015 IN FA/4484/2016 WITH
CA/16921/2015 IN FA/4485/2016 WITH CA/16923/2015 IN FA/4486/2016
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION STRENGTHENINGDIVN, OMERGA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRTA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gulab B. Rajale AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.B. Girase
. . .
CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J. DATE : 18th December, 2017.
PER COURT:
This court, under order dated 8.12.2016 granted stay to the execution and implementation of the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court subject to condition that the appellant Acquiring Body shall deposit the entire decretal amount awarded by the Reference Court, alongwith interest accrued thereon in this appeal, within a period of twelve weeks. But, it appears that there is no compliance of the said order. The appellant Acquiring Body did not deposit the decretal amount in this court. Hence, the applications for stay stand rejected. The respondents original claimants are at liberty to execute the award before the Executing Court as per the provisions of law.
grt/-
The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Strengthening Divn, Omerga
The State of Maharashtra
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
