Allowed

Ameensab Rahemansab Shaikh (Died) Chandbee (Died) Thr Lrs Momin Khadar and Ors. v. Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer Latur and Anr.

Bombay HC11 Oct 2017CA/12980/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad heard a civil application by warrantors seeking permission to withdraw partial land acquisition award amounts. The court granted 25% unconditionally and 25% subject to bank guarantee/security, with disposal pending the acquiring body's first appeal decision.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw 25% unconditionally and remaining 25% on furnishing solvent security or bank guarantee pending first appeal disposal.

Ameensab Rahemansab Shaikh (Died) Chandbee (Died) Thr Lrs… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

{1}

¶2

903-CA 12980 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

903 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12980 OF 2017

¶5

IN FA/181/2011

¶6

AMEENSAB RAHEMANSAB SHAIKH (DIED), CHANDBEE AMEENSAB MOMEEN (DIED), THR. LRS MOMIN KHADAR AND ORS. VERSUS

¶7

THE GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, LATUR AND ANOTHER

¶8

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.G.K.Sontakke Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr.M.N.Navandar h/f. Mr.S.G.Sangle AGP for Respondent No.2 : Mr.Y.G.Gujarathi

¶9

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE: 11^th October, 2017

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

By this Civil Application, the applicants seek permission to withdraw remaining 50% amount with interest in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court in S.L.P. No.23626 to 23633 of 2014.

¶12

The learned counsel for the applicants invited our attention to the order dated 10.7.2013 passed by this Court in various Civil Applications filed by the claimants thereby permitting those claimants to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by acquiring body i.e. 25% unconditionally and balance 25% on furnishing bank guarantee of any Nationalized/Scheduled Bank for the like amount. He also invited our attention to the order dated 13.4.2015 passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.3689-3696 of 2015 and other group of matters. He submits that all Civil Applications filed by them before this Court, which

¶13

{2}

¶14

903-CA 12980 of 2017

¶15

were disposed of on 10.7.2013 were arising out the same Notification and were in respect of the same land and location. The Supreme Court in the said order has permitted the claimants to withdraw 50% of the enhanced compensation without security whereas balance of 50% amount on furnishing security/surety to the satisfaction of the Collector.

¶16

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 did not dispute this position.

¶17

1. We, therefore, pass the following order:-

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(I) The applicants would be permitted to withdraw 25% of the amount lying in this Court unconditionally, however, on furnishing an undertaking before the Executing Court to the effect that if the applicants fail in the First Appeal filed by the acquiring body, the applicants would return the amount with interest at the rate as this Court may direct. The balance 25% of the amount is permitted to be withdrawn on furnishing solvent security/surety or bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the learned Collector.

¶20

(II) If any solvent security/surety or bank guarantee as directed to be furnished by the learned Collector, is furnished

¶21

{3}

¶22

903-CA 12980 of 2017

¶23

by the applicants, the same shall be kept alive till the disposal of the First Appeal and for a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶24

(III) It is made clear that if the solvent security/surety or bank guarantee as directed to be furnished by the learned Collector, is not furnished, the said amount shall be invested by the Collector in the Fixed Deposit initially for a period of two years and thereafter for a like period after obtaining further order of this Court.

¶25

(IV) The parties as well as the Collector and Executing Court to act on the authenticated copy of this Court.

¶26

(V) The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

(VI) No order as to costs.

¶28

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL , J ) ( R.D. DHANUKA, J )

¶29

spt

Ameensab Rahemansab Shaikh (Died) Chandbee (Died) Thr Lrs Momin Khadar and Ors. v. Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ameensab Rahemansab Shaikh (Died) Chandbee (Died) Thr Lrs Momin Khadar and Ors. v. Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mathurabai Pandurng Bansode Vs the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur and Anr.

Pandurang Dadarao Bansode Vs the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Regional Officer, M.I.D.C. Latur and Anr.

Narayan Bapurao Chaval Vs Amgothu Shri Ranga Naik

Mohammad Hasan S/O Turabsaheb Fakir Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sangita Vishnupant Godhane and Others Vs the Deputy Ex. Engineer, Central Railways (Cons) Pune and Anr.

Laxuman Malappa Chavan Vs M.I.D.C. through Divisional Officer Division at Latur and Ors.