High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. Condoning the 46-day delay, the court allowed and disposed of the civil application. Notice was issued to respondents.
Civil application allowed; delay of 46 days condoned; notice to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
907 ca.1249.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1249 OF 2017
IN AOST/358/2017
PRAMOD DHANANJAYRAO NIMBALKAR AND OTHERS
VERSUS
DHANANJAYRAO SHANKARRAO NIMBALKAR AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S. S. Choudhary. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. G. Chapalgaonkar.
P.C.:
counsel appearing for Respondent Respondent No.2. Though Respondent No.1 duly served, none appears.
No.2 waives the service of notice.
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 46 days in filing the appeal is condonable.
Pramod Dhananjayrao Nimbalkar and Others
Dhananjayrao Shankarrao Nimbalkar
Another
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
