Single judge civil application where appellant's AGP argued no stay needed as decretal amount deposited, leading to disposal of application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11962/2014 IN FAST/29809/2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS SURESH DATTATRAY PURANIK AND ANOTHER
AGP for applicants : Mr. S.R. Yadav. Adv. for respondent :- Mr. R.C. Kulkarni
CORAM : K. K. SONAWANE, J. Dated: December 21, 2017
PER COURT :-
Heard learned AGP for the applicant. None for the respondents. According to learned AGP, the decretal amount has already been deposited in this court and respondents/original claimants were also permitted to withdraw the amount. In such circumstances, there is no propriety to grant any stay in favour of the applicant State. Accordingly, civil application stands disposed of.
[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.
grt/-
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
SURESH DATTATRAY PURANIK AND ANOTHER
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
