Single judge order condoning delay in filing a Review Application in Writ Petition No.4103 of 2016. The application was allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11174 OF 2016 IN
REVIEW APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.22202 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4103 OF 2016
Taterao s/o. Mahadu Bagul,
Age-54 years, Occ. Service,
[as Addl. Collector, Nandurbar]
r/o. Tokar Talav Road,
Nandurbar, Dist. Nandurbar
..Applicant
Vs.
1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Addl. Chief Secretary (Revenue), Revenue and Forest Department, M.S., Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
2. The Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik .. Respondent
Mr.R.B.Raghuwanshi, Advocate i/b. Mr.D.S.Bagul,
Advocate for applicant
Mr.V.M.Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER18, 2017
ORDER (PER SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) :
Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant
and the learned A.P.P. for the respondents.
2 C.A.No.11174-16
2.For the reasons mentioned in the
application, delay in filing the Review Application
is condoned in the interest of justice.
3.The application is accordingly allowed and
disposed of.
kbp
1 issue framed by the court
whether to condone the delay in filing the Review Application
Taterao s/o. Mahadu Bagul
The State of Maharashtra Through its Addl. Chief Secretary (Revenue)
The Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court