Bail application allowed in a matrimonial dispute involving accidental burn injury allegations. The High Court noted inconsistencies in dying declarations and lack of tampering risk, granting bail secured with monetary bond.
Bail granted to the applicant on furnishing P.B. and S.B. of Rs. 15,000/- each with one surety of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/2
3-BA627.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 627 OF 2017
Anil Anandrao Bichkar
….. Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
….. Respondent
Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2017
P.C .
The application is filed for bail. Both the sides are heard.
kvm
2/2
3-BA627.17
There is no possibility of tampering of the prosecution witnesses in the aforesaid circumstances. So the application is allowed. The applicant is to be released on bail on his furnishing P.B. and S.B. of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount. The applicant is not to tamper with prosecution witnesses. He is not to commit similar offences.
(T.V.NALAWADE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant where there is an inconsistency in the dying declarations implicating him.
Anil Anandrao Bichkar
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
