Allowed

Sagar Suresh Bansode v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC30 Mar 2017BA/616/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed the bail application of an applicant alleged to have committed assault resulting in death. The applicant was enlarged on bail subject to several conditions including furnishing a bond, attending police stations, and cooperating with the trial.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 10,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount, subject to specific conditional undertakings.

Sagar Suresh Bansode Vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2017)

6-ba.616-2017.doc

1/4

nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.616 OF 2017

¶6

Sagar Suresh Bansode ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶7

Mr.P.G.Sarda, for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr.Prashant Jadhav, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶10

DATE : 30^th MARCH, 2017

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for

¶13

the Respondent - State.

¶14

By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

¶15

bail in connection with C.R.No.110 of 2015 registered with the Wanwadi

¶16

Police Station, Pune for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147, 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

6-ba.616-2017.doc

¶18

2/4

¶19

The incident in question has taken place on 26^th April, 2015 at about 10.30 p.m. It is alleged that the applicant alongwith co-accused came to the spot and assaulted Akbar Hussain Sayyed with fists and kick blows. In the said assault, co-accused – Yogesh Adsul is alleged to have picked up a stone lying at the spot and thrown the same on Akbar’s head, after which all the accused ran away from the spot.

¶20

Perused the papers. The applicant is alleged to have assaulted the deceased with fists and kick blows. The cause of death is stated to be ‘death due to head injury’. Co-accused – Yogesh Adsul is alleged to have picked up a stone lying on the spot and thrown it on the deceased. Admittedly, the applicant was not armed with any weapon. The applicant is 19 years of age and has been in custody since April, 2015.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

¶22

applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms and conditions:-

¶23

ORDER

¶24

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶25

6-ba.616-2017.doc

¶26

3/4

¶27

ii) The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station on the first

¶28

Monday of every month between 10.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m., till the conclusion of the trial;

¶29

(iii) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of residence and mobile contact number immediately after being released and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time to the Court seized of the matter and to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station;

¶30

(iv) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

¶31

(v) The Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial;

¶32

(vii) An undertaking to the aforesaid clauses (ii) to (v), shall be filed by the Applicant, in the Trial Court, within two weeks’ of his release.

¶33

6-ba.616-2017.doc

¶34

4/4

¶35

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is

¶36

accordingly disposed of.

¶37

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

¶38

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶39

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Sagar Suresh Bansode v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Suresh Bansode v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sopan Alias Pappu Maruti Gavali Vs the State of Maharashtra

Prakash Bhupal Bindage Vs the State of Maharashtra

Tarun Sunil Roy Vs the State of Maharashtra

Raja Subhash Salunkhe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Manmit Vinod Updeshi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahesh Shashikant Kushte Vs the State of Maharashtra