The High Court disposed of the bail application as withdrawn after the applicant counsel sought withdrawal. The judge directed the lower court to expedite the trial within four months.
The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty granted to the applicant to approach this Court again if the matter is not disposed of within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-BA588-17.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 588 OF 2017
Amit Machinder Patil Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Applicant
…Respondent
Mr. Sudhir C. Halli, for the Applicant. Ms. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J DATED: 18th August 2017
PC:-
1. When this Court expressed that this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, Mr. Halli, the learned Counsel for the Applicant on instructions wants to withdraw the proceeding.
2. The Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. Mr. Halli submits that the Applicant is behind the bar for more than two and half years and so the trial may be expedited. In view of the nature of the material collected against the Applicant, this Court holds that the Trial Court may dispose of the matter within four months from this order. If the matter is not disposed within the time
Page 1 of 2
18th August 2017
25-BA588-17.DOC
stipulated, there will be liberty to the Applicant to come this Court again.
(T. V. NALAWADE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
18th August 2017
Amit Machinder Patil
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court