Two bail applications were withdrawn by the applicants with leave and liberty to file fresh applications if the trial concerning C.R. No. I-272 of 2016 does not commence within six months.
Withdrawal of bail applications allowed with liberty to file fresh ones if trial does not commence within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(44) BA 586-17
Amk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 586 OF 2017
Mr. Rajendra Kundanlal Jain & Anr. .. Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 587 OF 2017
Mr. Rakesh Shantilal Porwal .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. M. S. Mohite a/w. Ms. Sonal Parab i/b Ganesh Bhujbal for the Applicant.
Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State in B.A.No.586/17. Ms. Jyoti S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State in B.A.No.587/17. Mr. Shahuraj Ranavare, API, Wada Police Station present.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 2 nd MAY, 2017.
P. C. :
when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, the learned counsel,
on instructions from the relatives of the applicants, seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty file a fresh application before the Trial Court if the trial pertaining to C. R. No. I-272 of 2016 registered with Wada Police Station, District Palghar does not commence within a period of six months from today.
1/2
(44) BA 586-17
aforesaid liberty.
[A. S. GADKARI, J.]
2/2
Mr. Rajendra Kundanlal Jain & Anr.
Mr. Rakesh Shantilal Porwal
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court