Disposed
Anil Pandit Aher v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/324/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901.BA324_2016.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 324 OF 2016
Anil Pandit Aher ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. G.S. Jadhav i/b. Mr. Raju D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for the State.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 24th January, 2017.
P.C.:
I am informed by the learned APP and learned counsel for the applicant that the trial has commenced and 8 witnesses are examined. Under such circumstances, there is no proprietary in entertaining this Bail Application. Hence, Bail Application is disposed of.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
Anil Pandit Aher
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court