The Criminal Appellate Bench rejected the bail application of the accused alleged of assaulting his wife under IPC Sections 307, 504 and Bombay Police Act Section 135. The court held bail was not a fit case citing witness tampering risks.
Application for bail is rejected. Trial is expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-ba.320.2017.doc
1/3
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.320 OF 2017
Kiran Dagdu More @Parit ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.U.R.Agandsurve, for the Applicant.
Ms.Rutuja Ambekar, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State
API – A.B.Shaikh, Vijapur Naka Police Station, District-Solapur.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE : 6th JUNE, 2017
P.C. :
bail in connection with C.R.No.129 of 2016 registered with the Vijapur Naka Police Station, District-Solapur, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.
22-ba.320.2017.doc
2/3
22-ba.320.2017.doc
3/3
the observations made in this order.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in connection with offences of attempted murder and intentional insult under IPC Sections 307 and 504.
Whether the possibility of tampering with witnesses rules out the grant of bail in this case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kiran Dagdu More @Parit
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
