Criminal bail application dismissed. Bail not granted as evidence recording was in progress. Liberty to withdraw petition allowed. Record evidence to be completed by a specified date.
Liberty to withdraw the bail application granted. The Sessions Court directed to complete evidence recording by 30/3/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
29-BA-2689-17.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2689 OF 2017
Balasaheb Rangonda Patil vs.
The State of Maharashtra
..Applicant
...Respondent
Mr. Nagesh Y. Chavan for the Applicant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent .
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATE : 18th December, 2017
P.C.:
. Mr.Chavan, learned counsel for the Applicant upon instructions submits that in the present case the evidence of the victim is recorded. Similarly, the other witnesses are in the course of being examined.
(SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
Balasaheb Rangonda Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
