The High Court of Bombay rejected the bail application in a gang rape case involving a minor under the POCSO Act and IPC, holding that the applicant does not deserve release due to the gravity of the offence.
Application for bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /2BA-260-17-44
Nalawade
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 2017 Chandrya @ Chandrakant V. Bhangali vs. State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.K.S.Patil for the Applicant. Mr. P.P.Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 4th May, 2017
P.C.
2 /2BA-260-17-44
After taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, this Court is of the view that the applicant does not deserve to be released on bail.
( A.S.GADKARI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving gang rape under the POCSO Act and IPC.
Whether the gravity of the offence precludes the release of the applicant on bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Chandrya @ Chandrakant V. Bhangali
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
