In bail application 1916 of 2017, the Court observed that with the framing of charge presumption of trial commencement applies and directed the Sessions Judge to conclude evidence recording by 30/7/2018 before disposing the application.
Application disposed of following direction to Sessions Court to conclude evidence recording by 30/7/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
11-BA-1916-17.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1916 OF 2017
Dhananjay Rajaram Dighe vs. The State of Maharashtra
...Applicant
...Respondent
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi for the Applicant. Mr.Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATE : 14th December, 2017
P.C.:
. Mr.Chate, learned APP upon instructions submits that in the present case i.e. Sessions Case No.517/2014 pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune , charge is framed on 9/12/2014. Once the charge is framed it is presumed that the trial has commenced. In view of this, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune shall make an endeavour to conclude recording of evidence as far as possible by 30/7/2018.
(SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the trial court to conclude evidence recording by a specific date given the framing of charge.
Dhananjay Rajaram Dighe
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
