Allowed

Abdul Altaf @ Tipu Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Feb 2017BA/170/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the High Court granted bail to the applicant charged with offences under Sections 307, 452, 506, 427, and 34 IPC. The applicant was to furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 and reside outside Govandi jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and residing outside Govandi jurisdiction.

Abdul Altaf @ Tipu Chaudhary Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

36.ba170.17.sxw

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2017

¶5

Abdul Altaf @ Tipu Chaudhary. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondents.

¶6

... Respondents.

¶7

Ms. Apeksha Vora, advocate for Applicant.

¶8

Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for State.

¶9

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2017

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1 Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for State.

¶12

2 This is an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicant herein is arrested on 19/4/2016 in Crime No. 119 of 2016 registered at Shivaji Nagar Police Station for offences punishable under section 307, 452, 506(2), 427 read with

Talwalkar

1/4

2 36.ba170.17.sxw

section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed.

¶17

2 It is the case of the prosecution that on 18^th March, 2016 Aslam Taasduk Hussain Choudhari lodged a report at the police station alleging therein that he had some civil dispute with his paternal uncle Abdulla. The applicant happens to be son of Abdulla. The brother of the first informant namely Mohd. Ashraf had assaulted the applicant on 7/10/2015. According to the victim on 17/3/2016, the applicant had assaulted him with sword. His associates had assaulted him with chopper due to the old disputes.

¶18

3 The injury certificate indicates that the first informant had sustained one CLW on his forehead, which was grievous in nature, one CLW on his forearm and superficial injuries on his forearm which are simple in nature. The allegation against the present applicant is that he had assaulted with sword. However, it appears that the injury caused on the forehead was with the chopper, which was used by

¶19

Talwalkar 2/4

¶20

3 36.ba170.17.sxw

¶21

another co-accused. The applicant has been in custody for past 10 months. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed. The learned APP submits that the applicant has criminal antecedents. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in Crime No. 41 of 2011 registered for offence punishable under section 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant has been acquitted and as far as Crime Nos. 73/13 and 82/14 are concerned, these are cross cases between two rival groups.

¶22

4 Taking into consideration the nature of injuries attributed to the applicant and the submissions advanced across the bar, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶23

6 However, the observations are prima facie in nature and restricted to the application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the trial Court shall not be influenced by the same at the time of trial.

Talwalkar

3/4

36.ba170.17.sxw

7 Hence, following order is passed.

¶29

ORDER

¶30

(i) The application is allowed.

¶31

(ii) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶32

(iii) The applicant shall not reside within the jurisdiction of Govandi till conclusion of the trial.

¶33

8 The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶34

( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)

¶35

Talwalkar

¶36

4/4

Abdul Altaf @ Tipu Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Altaf @ Tipu Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Munnalal Gupta Vs the State of Maharashtra

Juglesh Suresh Gupta and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Faizal Wadgama Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashfaq Ahmed Khan @ Ashfaq Mustaq Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Amarubanisha Nasirali Shaikh and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kamalkant Maheshchand Saini Vs the State of Maharashtra