Allowed

Nilesh Anil Garud v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Sept 2017BA/1447/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the court considered a case involving dowry harassment and suicide under Sections 498A and 306 IPC. The applicant was a husband of the deceased who committed suicide. The court noted the applicant was not present at the incident and granted bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 and one or two solvent local sureties in the like amount, subject to appearance conditions.

Nilesh Anil Garud Vs the State of Maharashtra — Dowry and Cruelty | Bombay HC (2017)

1/3

BA.1447-2017

Dond

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO.1447 OF 2017

Nilesh Anil Garud

..Applicant

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶10

Mr. Dipak Churi for Applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State.

¶11

CORAM: A.S. GADKARI, J.

¶12

DATE : 19^th September 2017.

¶13

P.C.

¶14

1] This is an application under Section 439 of Cr. P.C. for bail in

¶15

CR No.I-199 of 2016 dated 28.11.2016 registered with Manmad Police Station, District- Nashik under Section 498A, 306, r/w 34 of the Indian

¶16

Penal Code.

¶17

2] The first information report is lodged by Shri Suresh S. Shinde, father of deceased Smt. Ravina. Applicant is the husband of deceased Smt. Ravina. It is the prosecution case that, the marriage between

¶18

the applicant No.1 and deceased Smt. Ravina took place on 26.6.2016.

¶19

2/3

¶20

BA.1447-2017

¶21

That the applicant and his parents used to harass deceased Smt. Ravina by demanding the expenses incurred by them for performing the said marriage of the applicant and Smt. Ravina. That Smt. Ravina due to said consistent harrasment and demand, Smt. Ravina committed suicide at her matrimonial house on 22.11.2017 at about 4.00 p.m. During the course of investigation, the applicant came to be arrested on 28.11.2016. After completion of investigation, police have submitted chargesheet.

¶22

3] As stated earlier, it appears from the record that it is the allegation against the applicant and his parents that they used demand expenses incurred by them for performing marriage of the applicant and Smt. Ravina (deceased) and due to the same harassment, Smt. Ravina committed suicide. The record indicates that on the date of incident, applicant was not present at his residence and had been to his working place and after intimation from the neighbours, he rushed to the spot.

¶23

4] In view of the above, applicant can be released on bail.

¶24

Hence the following Order:

¶25

(i) The applicant be released on bail in CR No.I-199 of 2016 registered with Manmad Police Station, District-Nashik on his furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two

¶26

solvent local sureties in the like amount.

¶27

3/3

¶28

BA.1447-2017

¶29

(ii) After their release from the jail, the applicant shall attend Manmad Police Station, District-Nashik once in month i.e. on

¶30

every 1^st Monday of the said month between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00

¶31

p.m.

¶32

(iii) The applicant shall also attend all the dates before the Trial Court.

¶33

(iv) Any two consecutive defaults in complying with the aforesaid conditions, shall attract the provisions of cancellation of bail.

¶34

(v) Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and/or influence the prosecution witnesses.

¶35

(vi) Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶36

(A.S. GADKARI,J.)

Nilesh Anil Garud v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilesh Anil Garud v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Bansilal Vyas @ Mamaji Vs Mahadeo Bhau Gavali and Anr.

Sudhir Raosaheb Kumble Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shivaji Baliram Kavade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Dilip Dandgaval Vs the State of Maharashtra

Atul Alias Pintu Nandkumar Mohite Vs State of Maharashtra

Mohd Pintu Kazam Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra