The High Court of Bombay disposed of two arbitration petitions after the arbitrator filed a disclosure statement under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ARP30.17-35
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.30 OF 2017
Ashok Maruti Bhalkar )….Petitioner
V/s. Auto Cars )....Respondent
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.27 OF 2017
Reena Jagannat Jagtap )....Petitioner V/s. Auto Cars )....Respondent
Mr.Chetan Gajanan Patil for petitioners.
Mr.Rishikesh Soni i/by Ram and Co. for respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 3.11.2017
P.C.:-
1 The arbitrator has filed the disclosure dated 4.10.2017 under section 11(8) read with section 12(1) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The same is taken on record.
2 Petitions accordingly disposed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Maruti Bhalkar
Reena Jagannat Jagtap
Auto Cars
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
