The High Court of Bombay dealt with an arbitration petition under consent terms tendered by both parties, disposing of the matter by recording consent terms and accepting the undertakings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbpl 281 of 2017 (915).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.281 OF 2017
Sameer Anil Nerurkar and Anr. …Petitioners
versus
…
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Respondent
Mr. Shilpan Gaonkar with Mr. Vikrant Zunjarrao, for Petitioners.
Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/by M/s. KMC Legal, for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 30th MARCH, 2017
P.C.:
1.The learned Advocates for the parties have tendered Consent Terms
dated 30th March, 2017. They submit that the Consent Terms be taken on record and
the above Arbitration Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The
Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent
Terms are signed by the Petitioner No.1 for self and for Petitioner No.2, the
Authorized Signatory of the Respondent as well as the Advocates for the parties. The
undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. The above Arbitration
'X'.
Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms, marked
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Sameer Anil Nerurkar and Anr.
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court