Allowed

Kishan Freight Forwarders v. Union of India

Bombay HC13 Nov 2017ARBAP/36/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, appointed an arbitrator for an arbitration dispute with the Western Railway. The parties waived the statutory grounds for disqualification of a party employee, allowing the appointee to act and dispense with objection. The court also directed timely disclosure of interests.

What did the court decide?

Arbitrator appointed with waived disqualification; fees shared; disclosure waived due to consent; rights and contentions kept open.

Kishan Freight Forwarders Vs Union of India — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

ARBAP36.17-32

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2017

¶5

Kishan Freight forwarders through ) Proprietor Kishan Kukreja )….Applicant V/s. Union of India through General Manager ) Western Railway & Ors. )....Respondent

¶6

Mr.Prashant G.Pandey i/by Ulhas Shinde for applicant. Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondent.

¶7

Mr.Mithun Kumar-Assistant Commercial Manager, Western Railway, Mumbai, present.

¶8

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 13.11.2017

¶9

P.C.:-

¶10

1 Mr.Pandey appearing for applicant states that the applicant

¶11

is waiving the applicability of sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Mr.Pandey for the applicant and Mr.Sureshkumar for respondent state that during the course of today, they will file a statement signed by the authorized signatory waiving the applicability of sub-section-5 of section 12 of the Act.

¶12

2 By consent, the following order is passed :-

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(i) Smt.Jagrati R.Singla, Dy. CCM (G), CCG, having her office at

¶15

Western Railway, Churchgate Head Quarters, Mumbai-400 020, Tel

¶16

¶17

2/2 ARBAP36.17-32

¶18

No.22002590, is appointed as arbitrator to adjudicate on all disputes including counter claim arising out of and relating to tender dated 7.1.2014 r/w letter of authority dated 20.2.2014 between the applicant and the Railway authority in respect of Train No.12903/04, Golden Temple Mail Express, Mumbai Central to Amritsar and Amritsar to Mumbai Central round trip basis for three years ;

¶19

(ii) The fees, administrative expenses, typing charges and venue charges if any, of the arbitrator shall be shared equally between the parties and the same will be cost in the arbitration proceedings ;

¶20

(iii) Within 4 weeks of receiving communication from the advocate for applicant forwarding a copy of this order, the Arbitrator shall file with parties disclosure in writing as required under Section 11(8) r/w section 12(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ;

¶21

(iv) In view of the consent signed by the parties which has been taken on record and marked `X' for identification, the fact that the arbitrator is an employee of Western Railway will not work as a disqualification :

¶22

(v) Petition accordingly, disposed.

¶23

(vi) All rights and contentions including limitation are kept open.

¶24

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)

¶25

Kishan Freight Forwarders v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishan Freight Forwarders v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Himatsingka Motor Works Limited

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs M/S Himatsingka Auto Enterprises and 4 Other

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Himatsingka Auto Enterprises and 4 Ors.

M/S Inc. Solutions and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs Trident Communications Pvt. Ltd. (CIN-U74899MH1992PTC236339)

Fusion Flair Vs Livewel Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. (CIN-U74999MH1998PTC116280)

Ms.Sangeeta M Patil Vs City Realcom Limited