Tejpratap Sreekant Singh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal application, the High Court modified a prior order dated 16.05.2016. The court incorporated an additional interim relief prayer clause (c) that was not recorded in the original order but was pressed into service by the applicant's counsel, aligning the document with the actual submissions made.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 16.05.2016 was modified to include interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c).