Allowed

Wajid Lala Mohammed Shaikh v. the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Mar 2017APPW/131/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court permitted the amendment of a writ petition to substitute the original minor applicant with himself after attaining majority. It directed the amendment within two weeks, extended compliance time on indulgence, and placed the main petition under fresh admission.

What did the court decide?

Permission to amend writ petition by replacing the petitioner; extension of time to comply with earlier order; placement of main petition under fresh admission.

Wajid Lala Mohammed Shaikh Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2017)

appw131

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.131 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1927 OF 2014

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Sharif Shahikh a/w Mr.Mateen Shaikh and Mr.Sajid
Qureshi for the petitioner/Applicant
Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5.

¶9

CORAM :A.S.OKA AND

¶10

 SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ.

¶11

DATE : MARCH 16, 2017

¶12

P.C.

¶13

1The writ petition was filed by the
father of the present applicant as the
applicant was the minor at the relevant
time. Now, the applicant has attained
majority.

¶14

2We, therefore, dispose of this
application by passing the following
order:

¶15

(i) We permit the amendment of this
writ petition by deleting the name of
the petitioner and replacing the same
by the present applicant;

¶16

2 appw131

¶17

(ii)Amendment shall be carried out
within a period of two weeks from the
date on which this order is uploaded;

¶18

(iii)Place the main writ petition under
the caption of `Fresh Admission' on 4th
April 2017.

¶19

(iv)Only by way of indulgence, time to
comply with the directions contained in
clause 2 of the order dated 24th
February 2017 is extended till the next
date. No further extension shall be
granted. Ad-interim relief granted
earlier to continue till then.

¶20

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J) (A.S.OKA,J.)

Wajid Lala Mohammed Shaikh v. the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wajid Lala Mohammed Shaikh v. the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Avadh Pal and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ajay Udayraj Yadav and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

M/S. Pabal Housing Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Atul Ramdas Dabare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Vinay Kumar Sarojkumar Jaiswar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kanta Tejas Maun Vs Dr. Tejas Knubhai Maun