The Bombay High Court rejected a criminal application seeking recall of a 9-year-old order dismissing a revision petition. The court noted that the applicant failed to file a review then and dismissed the historic petition without costs.
Application rejected; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-appr-405-2015.odt
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2007
Balu Krishna Jadhav … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. A. K. Tripathi i/b. JeyarajanMuthiahs for the Applicant. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATE : 24 th JULY, 2017
P.C.:
1/2
28-appr-405-2015.odt
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application seeking recall of an order dismissed 9 years prior should be allowed without a prior review.
Whether liberty to file an appeal is granted in this criminal application.
Balu Krishna Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
