Allowed

Swati @ Ragini Dinesh Sonawane @ Falguni @ Ragini Murlidhar Deore v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Aug 2017APPR/20/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay granted bail and suspended the execution of the substantive sentence imposed on the applicant convicted under IPC sections 406, 420, and 170, considering the pendency of the revision and the period of imprisonment already served.

What did the court decide?

Execution of substantive sentence suspended and applicant enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 15,000 with sureties.

Swati @ Ragini Dinesh Sonawane @ Falguni @ Ragini Murlidhar… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

23- appa 19 and 20-17.doc

¶2

Kavita

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2017

¶5

Swati @Ragini Dinesh Sonawane …Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent

¶6

Ms.Aparna Ashtivkar i/b Sathyanarayan for the Applicant Mr.Prashant Jadhav,APP for the State.

¶7

CORAM: SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J DATED: 18^th AUGUST, 2017

¶8

PC:-

¶9

1. By these Applications the Applicant has sought bail and

¶10

suspension of execution of substantive sentence imposed by judgment dated 30.09.2011 in Regular Criminal Case No.1149 of 2006 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.8,Nashik.

¶11

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

3. The Applicant herein has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 170 of the Indian

¶13

Page 1 of 3

¶14

23- appa 19 and 20-17.doc

¶15

Kavita

¶16

Penal Code. The maximum sentence imposed is of simple imprisonment for a term of one year. The Applicant is in custody since 11.11.2016 and has already undergone imprisonment for a period of 9 months. The Revision is of the year 2017. Considering the large pendency of the cases, the Revision is not likely to come up for final hearing in the couple of years. Considering that the Applicant has already undergone a period of imprisonment for about 9 months, the execution of sentence is suspended till the final disposal of the Appeal.

¶17

4. Under these circumstances, the Application is allowed. The execution of substantive sentence imposed by judgment dated 30.09.2011 in Regular Criminal Case No.1149 of 2006 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.8, Nashik is hereby suspended till the final disposal of the Revision and the Applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/-(Rs.Fifteen thousand only)with one or two sureties to the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.8, Nashik.

¶18

Page 2 of 3

¶19

23- appa 19 and 20-17.doc

¶20

Kavita

¶21

5. The Applicant shall furnish her contact number and permanent as well as local address, and contact number if any, and shall intimate change of address, if any, to the Investigating Officer, as well as to the concerned Court;

¶22

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. )

¶23

Page 3 of 3

Swati @ Ragini Dinesh Sonawane @ Falguni @ Ragini Murlidhar Deore v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swati @ Ragini Dinesh Sonawane @ Falguni @ Ragini Murlidhar Deore v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yusuf M. Talwala Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Yusuf M. Talwala Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ranjit Sham Chougule and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Pradeep Ramnayan Yadav Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Dashrath Gangaram Patil and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Appa Jaywant Chaudhari