The court condensed delay in filing a criminal revision application by an applicant-accused in jail. A lawyer assigned by the Legal Services Authority filed no objections. The application was allowed, with prayer (a) granted and prayer (b) deferred.
Condonation of delay in filing revision application allowed; prayer clause (a) granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38.appr-123.17.doc
1
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2017
Sunil Vitthal Tadasare … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent-State.
P.C.
By this application, the applicant-accused who is in jail has sought condonation of delay in filing the revision. Application is taken out for the applicant who is appointed from the panel of the Legal Services Authority. Perused the application. I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Accordingly application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Prayer clause (b) will be considered at the appropriate time. Call for R & P. Stand over as per CMIS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are sufficient causes to condone delay in filing a criminal revision application by an accused person in judicial custody.
Sunil Vitthal Tadasare
The State of Maharashtra
s.b.w
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
