The single-judge High Court of Bombay allowed an application by the applicant for the restoration of a Criminal Revision Petition due to the counsel's inadvertent absence, citing sufficient cause.
Criminal Revision Petition No.398 of 2016 restored to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-APPR-119-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2016
Savita Sunil Patil )...Applicant
V/s. Vivekanand C. Hiremath Since deceased Through his legal heirs Hema )...Respondents
Mr. Balwant Salunke i/by J.A.Madane, Advocates for the Applicant.
Mr. Chitan Shah, Advocate for R.Nos.1A to 1C.
Mr. S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 2nd MARCH, 2017.
P.C. :
Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant as
well as the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.1A to 1C and the learned APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
2 It is seen that due to inadvertence, the learned
Advocate appearing for the Revision Petitioner could not attend
the Revision Petition when it was called out for hearing on
Shivgan 1/2
903-APPR-119-2017.doc
15.2.2017. It is seen that learned Advocate for the Revision Petitioner/Applicant was prevented by 'Sufficient Cause' in not appearing before this Court when the matter is called out.
3 In this view of the matter, application is allowed. The Criminal Revision Petition No.398 of 2016 is restored to the file.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
2/2
Shivgan
Savita Sunil Patil
Vivekanand C. Hiremath Since deceased Through his legal heirs Hema
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
