The High Court at Aurangabad allowed two criminal applications filed by accused persons during their trial phase, granting them release on bail with fresh bonds.
Applicants released on bail on furnishing fresh bonds with appearance before trial court once in three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appln.3466/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3466 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.309 OF 2017
.. Applicants
Versus
. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr Ravi Bangar with Mr A.S. Barlota, Advocates for applicants Ms S.S. Raut, A.P.P. for respondent Mr R.V. Gore, Advocate assisting the A.P.P.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3537 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2017
Versus
. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for applicant Ms S.S. Raut, A.P.P. for respondent Mr R.V. Gore, Advocate assisting A.P.P.
Cri.Appln.3466/2017
2
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND A.M. DHAVALE, JJ
DATE : 18th August 2017
PER COURT
( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( S.S. SHINDE, J.)
vvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail applications in Cr.App. Nos. 3466/2017 and 3537/2017 should be allowed pending trial.
Whether the applicants are admissible on grounds of prima facie chance of success.
Balu s/o Ganesh Pathade
Shivaji s/o Pandurang Pakhare
Dnyaneshwar Shankarrao Girge
Raju s/o Shivaji Bankar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
