In Criminal Application No. 2929 of 2017, the Hon'ble Single Judge allowed the application seeking permission for the applicant to intervene and assist the Public Prosecutor in an ongoing criminal proceeding.
Permission to intervene and assist the Public Prosecutor was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1-appln.2929.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
1 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2929 OF 2017
SHEELA W/O. TUKARAM JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. B. Shinde. APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. K. N. Lokhande. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Gajanan G. Kadam.
CORAM : K. L. WADANE, J. DATE : 14th June, 2017.
P.C.:
the Public Prosecutor.
2 For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed.
[ K. L. WADANE, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Public Prosecutor's consent for the applicant to intervene and assist in the public prosecution should be granted.
SHEELA W/O. TUKARAM JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
