The criminal writ petition and associated application were dismissed and rejected respectively because the petitioner failed to appear in court despite prior orders vacating stays and the absence of any interest to prosecute the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
949 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 676 OF 2010 WITH APPLN/2833/2010 IN WP/676/2010
SURESH DULICHAND SURANA VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. P.G. Borade
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : September 07, 2017.
ORDER :
. Nobody is present for the petitioner. Seen the orders
made by this Court on 21.7.2017 and 6.9.2017. Nobody for petitioner is turning up to prosecute the matter. This Court has already vacated the stay as no interest is shown to prosecute the matter. But, in spite of that nobody is turning up. So, the Petition itself is dismissed. The Application also stands rejected.
[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [T.V. NALAWADE, J.]
ssc/
Suresh Dulichand Surana
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
