The High Court granted leave to the recording officer to appeal against the conviction after finding witnesses P.Ws. 4 and 7 not properly appreciated by the trial court, holding the case established for seeking such leave. The appeal was admitted.
Leave to file appeal under Section 390 CrPC allowed; appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.A-2568-15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2568 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra
...APPLICANT
versus
Manik Nagappa Birajdar & ors.
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, APP for applicant - State Mr. B.B. Dahiphale, Advocate holding for Mr. N.P. Patil, Jamalpurkar, Advocate for Respondents No. 1 to 4
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATED : 5th JANUARY, 2017.
Order :-
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file an appeal against the conviction be allowed under Section 390 CrPC.
State of Maharashtra
Manik Nagappa Birajdar and ors.
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
