Disposed

Dilip S/O Nana Tayde v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Apr 2017APPLN/2025/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants withdrew four criminal applications. The Court disposed of them as withdrawn but directed independent investigation into police station events where applicants' representatives gathered and a person named Ravindra was brought from and left the station.

What did the court decide?

Applications disposed as withdrawn. Independent investigation directed into police station circumstances.

Dilip S/O Nana Tayde Vs the State of Maharashtra — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

Cri.Appln.Nos. 2034/17 & Ors.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

8 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2034 OF 2017 WITH APPLN/2025/2017 WITH APPLN/2035/2017 WITH APPLN/2036/2017

¶5

NAGSEN RAJARAM SURALKAR AND VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶7

Advocate for Applicants in CA 2034, 2035/17 : Mr. Nagori Girish Advocate for Applicants in CA 2036, 2025/17 : Mr. V.D. Patnurkar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.M. Ganachari

¶8

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : April 27, 2017.

¶9

ORDER :

¶10

When this Court expressed that this Court is not inclined to grant relief, the learned counsels for applicants in all four proceedings, on instruction, submit that they want to withdraw the proceedings. Disposed of as withdrawn.

¶11

Though the applications are disposed of as withdrawn, in view of the circumstances which are there in police papers, it is desirable that the concern District Superintendent of Police should personally look in to the matter. When many persons from the side of the applicants had gathered at the police station and they were virtually waiting for Ravindra and Ravindra was brought to the police station on that

¶12

Cri.Appln.Nos. 2034/17 & Ors. 2

¶13

night, ordinarily police would not have allowed Ravindra to leave the police station alone. Many persons were waiting for him and there was always possibility that they were to take Ravindra in custody to teach him lesson. There is statement of one Sopan Sonawane, who had seen one van first proceeding towards the police station and then leaving police station and then some motorcycles following that van. These circumstances need thorough investigation, but by independent agency and not by any officer of the same police station, who were involved in the aforesaid matter.

¶14

Authenticated copy is allowed to the learned APP.

¶15

Registrar Judicial is to send copy of this order to the concerned Superintendent of Police.

¶16

[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]

¶17

ssc/

Dilip S/O Nana Tayde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip S/O Nana Tayde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnu S/O Arjun Dalvi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Yogesh S/O. Dagduba Sawant and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dilip Chintaman Kahre and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sunil S/O. Sonerao Jogdand Vs the State of Maharashtra

Santosh S/O. Shravan Baviskar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Babasaheb S/O. Appasaheb Salunke and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra