Allowed

Tushar Nagesh Salve and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC4 May 2017APPLN/1409/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal application for anticipatory bail, the High Court at Aurangabad, relying on CCTV photographs that showed only cars and pedestrians but failed to prove an assault, confirmed the previously granted interim bail and issued directions for future police cooperation.

What did the court decide?

The application is allowed; interim relief granted on 16.03.2017 is confirmed; applicants directed to attend police station for one month.

Tushar Nagesh Salve and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Quashing and FIR | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

( 1 ) cria1409.17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1409 OF 2017

¶4

1. Tushar Nagesh Salve .. Applicants Age. 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. Vishnu Nagar, Jawahar Colony, Aurangabad.

¶5

2. Pradeep Vinayak Mhaske Age. 22 years, Occ. Student, R/o. Balaji Nagar, A-84, Nathnagar, Arihant Nagar, Aurangabad.

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

¶8

..Respondents

¶9

Mr.A.K. Bhosale, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr.A.A. Jagatkar, A.P.P. for respondent/State.

¶10

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE,J. DATED : 04.05.2017

¶11

P.C. :-

¶12

1.The application is filed for the relief of
anticipatory bail. Both the sides are heard. The papers
of investigation were made available for perusal.

¶13

2.The crime is registered on the basis of report
given by Sandip Dahale in respect of incident dated
18.01.2017. The F.I.R. Shows that he has made specific
allegation again Shaikh Hafiz that he has given blow of

¶14

sword. Though he has made allegation that present
applicants Tushar and Pradeep have come with Shaikh
Hafiz, but there is no allegation that they assaulted
him. Today learned A.P.P. has shown to this Court some
photographs taken from CC TV footage. Learned A.P.P.
submitted that in the photographs accused Pradeep can be
seen. There are some more persons standing and it can be
said that all the five persons are standing near auto-
rickshaw as spectators. No stick can be seen in the
hands of Pradeep. In the photographs obtained from CC TV
footage, Tushar is not seen. This Court has already
granted interim relief to the applicants. In view of the
record of the photographs, this Court holds that
protection needs to be given to the applicants.

¶15

3.In the result, the application is allowed. The
interim relief granted in favour of the applicants on
16.03.2017 is confirmed.

¶16

4.The applicants are to attend the concerned
Police Station for one month between 09.00 a.m. to 12.00
noon and co-operate in the investigation.

¶17

snk/2017/MAY17/ cria1409.17

Tushar Nagesh Salve and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tushar Nagesh Salve and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rafikoddin @ Gudya S/O Shafikoddin Shaikh and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bhushan @ Laxmikant Ashok Wankhede Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ravi S/O. Shyamsunder Bhokare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Alim S/O. Ibrahim Momin Vs the State of Maharashtra

Santosh S/O. Radhakishan Birute and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijaykumar Ramnath Mantri and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra