Bench allowed and disposed of criminal application relying on recorded compromise terms where the applicant agreed to pay medical reimbursement and incur further costs to settle the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran5494.16
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5494 OF 2016 WITH APPLN/1275/2017 IN APPLN/5494/2016
SWAPNIL SUDHAKAR JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Adv. for Applicant : Mr. V.B. Jogdand Patil and Mr. Shrikrishna S Shinde APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S.P. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vijay Dhakne
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 9th MARCH, 2017
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
and without prejudice to the contentions of the respondents, the application is allowed and disposed of. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant and respondent No.2 submit
that compromise deed/terms are placed on record, which are verified by the applicant and respondent No.2. The parties are identified by
their repetitive counsel. The said compromise terms is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Para Nos. 2 to 5 of the said
cran5494.16
-2-
compromise terms are re-produced herein below:-
cran5494.16 -3-
rlj/
SWAPNIL SUDHAKAR JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
