Allowed
Mahimud a. Latif Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/993/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
appa-993-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.993 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION 252 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.217 OF 2014
Mahimud A. Latif Quareshi ...Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.Ujwal R.Agandsurve for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
SARANG V.KOTWAL,JJ.
DATED : 16 AUGUST 2017
P.C.:
This is an Application for restoration of the Criminal Application
No.252 of 2017. For the reasons stated in the Application, the same is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
(SARANG V.KOTWAL, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
Mahimud A. Latif Quareshi
The State of Maharashtra
A.A. SAYED
SARANG V.KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court