The applicant sought leave to withdraw a criminal application with liberty to file a fresh application for expeditious hearing. The High Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the current application.
Leave to withdraw application with liberty to file fresh application for expeditious hearing granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.appa947.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 947 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 669 OF 2017
Ramu @ Ramdas Rupaji Bhavar. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondents
Mr. S.D. Nangre, advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J & SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2017
P.C.
1 Learned Counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file fresh application for expeditious hearing of the appeal after 6 months. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J]
[RANJIT MORE, J]
1 of 1
Talwalkar
Ramu @ Ramdas Rupaji Bhavar
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
