A single judge of the Bombay High Court considered an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application to restore a criminal appeal. The court found the stated reasons for the delay sufficient and granted condonation, disposing of the matter.
Condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of appeal granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(16)APPANo.6982016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATON NO.698 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.164 OF 2015
Girish R. Bokadia
... Applicant
V/s.
Mr.Prithviraj Jogani & Anr.
... Respondents
Mr.Sandip Bhatavia with Devika Nadar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr..S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 14th DECEMBER 2017.
P.C. :
1 This is an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for restoration of appeal.
2 Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant/accused and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears for respondent No.2/State. None appeared for respondent No.1 though served.
3 For the reasons stated in the duly sworn application, the delay in filing an application for restoration of appeal is condoned.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(16)APPANo.6982016
4
The application is accordingly disposed of.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing an application for restoration of appeal should be condoned?
Girish R. Bokadia
Mr. Prithviraj Jogani & Anr.
A.M. BADAR J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
