The High Court held that upon the disposal of the principal Criminal Appeal No.1011 of 2012, the connected Criminal Application No.615 of 2016 ceases to subsist and was disposed of without any further adjudication on merits or specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 APPA 615-16 in APEAL 1011-12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.615 OF 2016
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1011 OF 2012
Sau. Pratibha Prabhakar Karalkar & Ors. ] … Applicants / Orig. Appellant Nos.1, 2 & 3 Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] … Respondents
Mr. Aniket Vagal for Applicants. Ms. R. M. Gadhvi, APP for State.
CORAM :- A. A. SAYED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :- 15 SEPTEMBER, 2017
P. C. :-
In view of disposal of Criminal Appeal No.1011 of 2012, Criminal Application No.615 of 2016 does not survive and the same is also disposed off.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
1 of 1
URS
Sau. Pratibha Prabhakar Karalkar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A. A. SAYED
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
